Summary
TLDR: The man in question caused a lot of harm, but arguing for a sentence longer than 25 years is unfair to both him and the industry he once represented.
Key Points
1. He caused significant harm through his actions.
2. Arguing for a sentence longer than 25 years may be unjust considering his past contributions to the industry.
3. It is important to consider both the harm caused and the individual’s previous contributions when determining an appropriate sentence.