Summary
TLDR: Prosecutors argue that Eisenberg’s legal attempts to reclaim his money came after his identity as the exploiter was revealed, and he believed he was off the hook due to a proposal to Mango Markets’ DAO.
Key Points
1. Prosecutors argued that Eisenberg’s legal attempts to retrieve his money came after his identity as the exploiter had been revealed.
2. Eisenberg believed that his proposal to Mango Markets’ DAO and its “waiver of liability” absolved him of responsibility, leading him to return to the U.S.
3. The prosecutors asserted that Eisenberg’s actions were emboldened by his belief that he was no longer accountable for the exploitation.