Summary
Lido strategic advisor, Hasu, expressed concerns that the unilateral deployment and marketing of a bridge could pressure the DAO into accepting a proposal to avoid liquidity fragmentation and inconvenience for users. This could make it harder for the DAO to consider alternative bridge proposals, putting Lido stakers and participating chains in a challenging position.
Key Points
1. The deployment and marketing of a bridge in an official-seeming way by a single entity can be perceived as a form of pressure on the DAO to accept a proposal, potentially leading to liquidity fragmentation and a negative user experience.
2. Marketing efforts to drive users towards a specific bridge option make it more difficult for the DAO to consider and accept alternative bridge proposals, thereby limiting the flexibility and options available to stakeholders.
3. These actions create a challenging situation for the DAO, Lido stakers, and participating chains, as they are forced to navigate the consequences and implications of the unilaterally deployed bridge and its associated marketing efforts.